David Warner vs Steven Smith
Pick each player's season, choose the metrics, and share the head-to-head.
Batting
| Statistic | David Warner318 innings | Steven Smith321 innings |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 284 | 318 |
| Innings | 318 | 321 |
| Not outs | 25 | 45 |
| Runs | 12466 (higher) | 12085 |
| Highest score | 335 (higher) | 211 |
| Average | 42.55 | 43.79 (higher) |
| Strike rate | 92.42 (higher) | 68.64 |
| Hundreds | 29 | 30 (higher) |
| Fifties | 69 (higher) | 63 |
| Fours | 1324 | 1178 |
| Sixes | 259 | 135 |
| Boundary % | 11.7 (higher) | 7.5 |
| Dot ball % | 53.7 (higher) | 60.6 |
Bowling
| Statistic | David Warner318 innings | Steven Smith321 innings |
|---|---|---|
| Innings bowled | 1 | 62 |
| Overs | 1 | 212.3 |
| Runs conceded | 5 | 1246 |
| Wickets | 0 | 40 (higher) |
| Best (wickets) | 0 | 3 (higher) |
| Average | — | 31.15 |
| Economy | 5.00 (higher) | 5.86 |
| Strike rate | — | 31.9 |
Reading this comparison
A highlighted value is the better one on that row — higher for runs and averages, lower for bowling averages, economy and dot-ball percentage. Highlighting is a reading aid, not a verdict: a better average over 12 innings is not evidence of a better player.
Sample sizes are shown in the header. Where a player has never been dismissed, the average is an em dash rather than an infinite value.
This comparison combines all formats. A Test average and a T20 average measure different things, so read a combined figure with that in mind. Full methodology





